|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Leading specialty retailer of leather outerwear, apparel and accessories
in the United States.
- 619 Stores in 45 states
- Mall
- Outlet
- Airport
- Seasonal Stores (additional 200-300 stores)
- 2002 Revenue - $720 Million
- Vertically integrated with production facilities throughout Asia
|
|
3
|
- No production Sourcing systems:
- Goal: Define and implement a
Sourcing systems infrastructure that will enable the achievement of long
term Sourcing objectives and support the company’s overall growth
initiatives
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Double and triple handling of every PO and Spec package
- Makers and Asia office unsure if data was accurate and / or timely
- Manual, weekly production tracking via email, phone calls, and
spreadsheets
- Non-targeted problem communication resulting in conflicting direction
- A manual, monthly process that could not support dynamic, weekly
ordering with varying cycle time requirements
|
|
6
|
- Not made solely with the removal of non-value added labor
- The case was made by evaluating the business impact of poor visibility
scenarios:
- Cost of missing a cancelled PO where demand has crashed
- Lost margin because of a 2 week delay in shipping on a trend item
- Lost margin because of a missed PO revision for an increase in demand
- Cost of product where the wrong sub material was used due to late spec
- Intangible - Sourcing can’t accommodate varying, weekly cycle times
- Intangible - Sourcing can’t scale, poor data integrity, flexibility
|
|
7
|
- Real time, web based, direct to maker PO’s and Spec Packages
- One central source of information, ensuring all stakeholders were
viewing the same, most current, accurate, and complete information
available
- Automated alerts and reporting to indicate production problems early in
the production cycle, enabling proactive vs. reactive issue resolution
- Targeted problem communication, collaboration, and resolution
- Technology that enabled dynamic ordering with varying production cycle
times
|
|
8
|
- Required a partner that grasped the business problem and had the
willingness and capability to grow with Wilsons and their requirements
over time
- Developed an RFP that included process scripts to be followed that
demonstrated the software’s capability to solve the business problems
- Invited three vendors to demonstrate their capabilities
|
|
9
|
- Exhibited tremendous customer focus and service in preparation
- Felt strongly about our ability to partner with NGC for the long term
- The technology solved our business problems
- Incomparable / Untouchable Ease of Use
- Low cost start up - utilized the common internet browser language
- Flexible and scaleable
|
|
10
|
- Initial implementation consisted of 3 e-SPS modules:
- Production Tracking
- Product Development
- Collaboration
- From hardware installation to start of maker pilot was 4 months
- The partnership yielded flawless system execution once in production
- Utilized train the trainer model to rollout. Trained via video conference in 2 hour
time frame. Web based
functionality extremely intuitive and well received.
|
|
11
|
- After a week of training vendors, our Hong Kong office reported: “Training went well and they love the
new system. They all believe it
will help them better manage their orders.
- On the home office side, we were slow to bring up our Accessories
vendors. Our Hong Kong office
regularly pushed to get Accessories implemented because of the benefit
they received with Garments.
- India desperately wanted to go-live on the system.
- From one of our toughest merchants:
“The system is very easy to use!”
|
|
12
|
- Eliminated majority of non-value added labor activity
- Improved cycle time
- Ensured the visibility to be timely, accurate, and single source
- Targeted communication / collaboration
- Moving to the proactive vs. the reactive
- Foundation for larger supply chain initiatives. Could not be executed without e-SPS.
|
|
13
|
- Change management is still the biggest component of any improvement
initiative. Technology by itself
will not change old habits. I.e.
The production veteran still wants to track production his way.
- Re-definition of roles is essential to move forward - time will be
filled
- The system is intuitive enough to be trained in 2 hours via video
conference
|
|
14
|
- Have implemented e-calendars that has enabled proactive leather
development tracking
- e-Pack is currently being implemented to provide electronic shipping
documents with the goal of eliminating customs delays / inefficiency
- Implementing Inbound Visibility in July 2003 to provide full
“in-transit” visibility from the time of PO ship through to DC receipt.
- Implementing quality module late 2003 that will enable remote quality
sampling, quality defect tracking, and vendor quality score carding.
|